The 2011 Mojo Standings
  • MatthewMatthew April 2011
    Nothing particularly significant with this thread, but I thought it'd be fun to keep track of who has the best mojo during the 2011 season.  Here's the standings through today... 

    Standings Through 9-28-11: 

    1.  Matthew - 11-7 - .611 
    2.  Doppelgangbang - 9-6* - .600 
    3.  grabarkewitz = 14-12 - .538  
    4.  BluePastorKyle - 12-12 - .500   
    5.  UCSB07 - 3-3 - .500
    6.  jwerthfan - 1-1* - .500 
    7.  Vinsandlosses - 15-16*(x2) - .484    
    8.  SamAdams -11-12 - .478
    9.  saeldway - 4-5 - .444  
    10.  ocmike24 - 1-2 - .333 
    11.  AllDayLA42 = 0-3 - .000 

    * = penalized extra loss for messing with the mojo. 
    Note: no game thread started on 6-3-11, 6-25-11, 7-17-11, 9-5-11 
  • SamAdamsSamAdams April 2011
    Okay, you mojo guys need to start it.  I'm a jinx, with or without Stinky pitching.
  • Matt, I think you should update this thread weekly.  It'll be fun to crown a mojo champ. 
  • Matt, I think you should update this thread weekly.  It'll be fun to crown a mojo champ. 



    Second!
  • SamAdamsSamAdams April 2011
    Try to find someone to start the thread tonight, with mojo points on the line.  Well, maybe I will, since my 0-1 is even lower than Loney's BA.
  • SamAdams said:

    Try to find someone to start the thread tonight, with mojo points on the line.  Well, maybe I will, since my 0-1 is even lower than Loney's BA.



    It's all yours, Jerry.  I will be entertaining company for a late dinner, and might not get to the DVR until 9:30 or so.  Go Blue!
  • MatthewMatthew April 2011

    Matt, I think you should update this thread weekly.  It'll be fun to crown a mojo champ. 



    That's the plan, Pastor! 

    Just updated. 
  • jamesmir11jamesmir11 April 2011
    Should the mojo champ win anything?
  • SamAdamsSamAdams April 2011

    Should the mojo champ win anything?



    Any plans for a booby prize, 'cuz I'm in line there?
  • MatthewMatthew April 2011
    Standings updated. 

    First place, suckas! 
  • ocmike24ocmike24 April 2011
    Matthew said:



    First place, suckas! 



    Small sample size.
  • MatthewMatthew April 2011
    ocmike24 said:

    Matthew said:



    First place, suckas! 



    Small sample size.


    I'm aware of that. 

    But still... in first place. 

    Look, Mike, Hughes don't have to rain on my parade just because you're Lower in the standings. 
  • ocmike24ocmike24 April 2011
    Bud:  3-0
  • saeldway April 2011
    ocmike24 said:

    Bud:  3-0



    I've got to think Mattingly set an us-against-the-world tone and the team is responding to that.  Kemp and Ethier eat that all up.
  • bob007hh April 2011
    Or they all hate McCourt as much as we do
  • bob007hh said:

    Or they all hate McCourt as much as we do



    I'm choosing to believe that one.
  • I vote Matthew starts tonight's game thread.
  • MatthewMatthew May 2011

    I vote Matthew starts tonight's game thread.



    Done! 
  • MatthewMatthew May 2011
    Updated. 
  • Well, I tried.

    Come on, nobody wants to take the vaunted Dodger offense behind Ted Lilly tonight?  That's almost a sure thing!
  • I'll take it.  I'm going for a RedSox-type of start this season.
  • UCSB07 May 2011
    Slow day at work means extra time for fun stats to go along with the mojo numbers
    Runs for Runs against ERA Avg Runs/9 W L Win %
    Doppelgangbang 56 42 4.42 5.89 8 4 0.67
    Jwerthfan 7 3 0.33 0.78 1 0 1.00
    Matthew 16 35 3.89 1.78 3 5 0.38
    OCMike 10 6 0.67 1.11 1 1 0.50
    BluePastorKyle 17 34 3.78 1.89 1 5 0.17
    Saeldway 2 11 1.22 0.22 0 1 0.00
    Samadams 11 25 2.78 1.22 0 4 0.00
    Vinsandlosses 9 7 0.78 1.00 1 1 0.50

    Most shutouts for
    Doppelgangbang 1

    Most shut outs against
    BluePastorKyle 2
    Matthew 1

    Most Extra inning games
    Doppelgangbang 3
  • UCSB07 May 2011
    this post looked so much better before i hit submit :-(
  • Bummer.  It might be better to save it as a picture and submit that.  Sorry... don't know why the board doesn't allow for better formatting.
  • Like this, maybe:

    image
  • UCSB07 May 2011
    Thanks for the help
  • These Buc announcers are a little cocky.  Funny.  
  • SamAdamsSamAdams May 2011
    Only Doppel can start future game threads.
  • SamAdams said:

    Only Doppel can start future game threads.



    Hey!  I passed a stone, AND got the W!  What're you tryin' to say?  I've got the SERIOUS mojo!
  • UCSB07 May 2011
    *correction in the runs against for doppel, should be 42 not 4
  • jWerthfanjWerthfan May 2011
    SamAdams said:

    Only Doppel can start future game threads.



    Really? Who else is undefeated?

    (*)
  • MatthewMatthew May 2011
    UCSB07 said:

    Slow day at work means extra time for fun stats to go along with the mojo numbers
    Runs for Runs against ERA Avg Runs/9 W L Win %
    Doppelgangbang 56 42 4.42 5.89 8 4 0.67
    Jwerthfan 7 3 0.33 0.78 1 0 1.00
    Matthew 16 35 3.89 1.78 3 5 0.38
    OCMike 10 6 0.67 1.11 1 1 0.50
    BluePastorKyle 17 34 3.78 1.89 1 5 0.17
    Saeldway 2 11 1.22 0.22 0 1 0.00
    Samadams 11 25 2.78 1.22 0 4 0.00
    Vinsandlosses 9 7 0.78 1.00 1 1 0.50

    Most shutouts for
    Doppelgangbang 1

    Most shut outs against
    BluePastorKyle 2
    Matthew 1

    Most Extra inning games
    Doppelgangbang 3



    I think I have a new favorite poster.  Impressive.  Thanks! 
  • MatthewMatthew May 2011
    Updated. 
  • MatthewMatthew June 2011
    Updated. 

    Look at that!  Sam making a run for it! 
  • saeldway June 2011
    Doppel's clearly been roiding! The * of the Mojo Standings.
  • I need to start a game thread, one of these days.
  • I am having a hard time wondering why we don't want saeldway - 0-2 starting all the game threads as we don't want Ned dealing away all the farm!
  • I am having a hard time wondering why we don't want saeldway - 0-2 starting all the game threads as we don't want Ned dealing away all the farm!



    I will start juicing and get a 50-game suspension. 
  • saeldway June 2011
    I would but I'm strictly the LOLGY (Lefty One Loss Guy)  You bring me in only when Kershaw's pitching to ensure the loss.
  • MatthewMatthew June 2011
    Updated. 
  • MatthewMatthew July 2011
    Updated! 
  • I think my last 'penalty' was a mistake - there was some confusion on who started the previous game.  Not that I'm very invested in this, just concerned with the total record

  • saeldway July 2011
    I DEMAND A RECOUNT!!
  • saeldway said:

    I DEMAND A RECOUNT!!



    lol
  • Yes, yes, yes! (in my best Wesley Snipes voice - from "Major League"
  • SamAdamsSamAdams July 2011

    Yes, yes, yes! (in my best Wesley Snipes voice - from "Major League"



    The key is to start the game thread when Kershaw is pitching.  Then, hope for one of those bizarre four game streaks.
  • SamAdams said:

    Yes, yes, yes! (in my best Wesley Snipes voice - from "Major League"



    The key is to start the game thread when Kershaw is pitching.  Then, hope for one of those bizarre four game streaks.


    One cannot go wrong with Kershaw.  
  • Let it be known that I reserved the right to not start the next game thread pending the outcome of Judge Gross' ruling.  I demand my asterisk be removed!  This is an outrage!
  • MatthewMatthew September 2011

    Let it be known that I reserved the right to not start the next game thread pending the outcome of Judge Gross' ruling.  I demand my asterisk be removed!  This is an outrage!



    The mojo is above court decisions.  Request denied! 
  • MatthewMatthew September 2011

    I think my last 'penalty' was a mistake - there was some confusion on who started the previous game.  Not that I'm very invested in this, just concerned with the total record



    No, it actually wasn't that one.  There was a game thread you didn't start somewhere during the last time I counted. 
  • MatthewMatthew September 2011
    Standings have been updated.  A nice, rightful change in the leaderboard, I see. 

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Apply for Membership

In this Discussion